<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bearing Error on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/bearing-error/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bearing Error on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/bearing-error/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What Causes RF Multipath and Bearing Error in Urban Sites?</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/what-causes-rf-multipath-and-bearing-error-in-urban-sites/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/what-causes-rf-multipath-and-bearing-error-in-urban-sites/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Urban RF sites often look strong on paper. A roof has line of sight, the direction finder is mounted high enough to clear nearby parapets, and the datasheet promises a clean angular error under test conditions. Then field use begins and a familiar pattern appears. Bearings look crisp in one corridor, drift in another, and become strangely persuasive in exactly the sectors where buildings, metal roofs, glass curtain walls, or dense traffic are most likely to distort propagation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
