<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Drone Detection Radar on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/drone-detection-radar/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Drone Detection Radar on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/drone-detection-radar/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Factory Acceptance Testing for Drone Detection Radar</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/factory-acceptance-testing-for-drone-detection-radar/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/factory-acceptance-testing-for-drone-detection-radar/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Factory acceptance testing, or FAT, is the buyer&amp;rsquo;s opportunity to prove that a drone detection radar system is complete, configured, and behaving as expected before it leaves the manufacturer or integration facility. It is not a substitute for site acceptance testing, but it can remove many avoidable risks before equipment reaches the field.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For counter-UAS projects, a good FAT should answer a disciplined question: is the delivered radar system ready to be shipped, installed, connected, and tested on site? It should not claim that the system has already proven real site coverage, because buildings, terrain, clutter, mounting height, weather, and local RF conditions only become real after installation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
