<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ku-Band Radar on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/ku-band-radar/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ku-Band Radar on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/ku-band-radar/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>X-Band vs Ku-Band Radar for Drone Detection</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/x-band-vs-ku-band-radar-for-drone-detection/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/x-band-vs-ku-band-radar-for-drone-detection/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;X-band and Ku-band radars are both common choices for low-altitude surveillance and drone detection. They sit close enough in the microwave spectrum that buyers sometimes treat them as interchangeable, but they are not the same design choice. The frequency band influences antenna size, beamwidth, resolution, clutter behavior, weather sensitivity, hardware packaging, and the way a radar fits into a real site.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There is no universal answer that X-band is always better or Ku-band is always better. A well-designed Ku-band radar can outperform a weak X-band radar, and a well-designed X-band radar can be the better fit for a wide-area site. The practical question is how the band supports the mission, the environment, and the rest of the counter-UAS system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
