<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Perimeter Security on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/perimeter-security/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Perimeter Security on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/perimeter-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Data Center Perimeter Security System Design</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/data-center-perimeter-security-system-design/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/data-center-perimeter-security-system-design/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Data center perimeter security is often discussed as if it were a fence problem. Put a barrier around the site, add cameras at gates, and the main physical-security job is done. That view is too narrow for facilities whose availability depends on service roads, generator yards, cooling infrastructure, rooftop plant, and increasingly on low-altitude airspace above the site.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What matters in practice is not only where the legal property boundary sits. What matters is where a threat can first be detected, how long it can be delayed, whether it can be verified quickly, and whether operators can route the event into the right response path before the incident reaches critical equipment or operating areas. That is a system-design problem, not a single-device problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
