<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Waveform Design on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/waveform-design/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Waveform Design on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/tags/waveform-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How Waveform Design Affects Small Target Detection</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/how-waveform-design-affects-small-target-detection/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/en/knowledge-base/how-waveform-design-affects-small-target-detection/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Waveform design affects small target detection because it controls how the radar spends time, energy, bandwidth, and processing attention. A small drone, bird-sized object, or low-RCS intruder may return only a weak echo. The radar cannot change the physics of that target, but it can choose how to illuminate the scene and how to extract useful information from the echo.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is why two radars with similar antennas and similar headline range can behave differently in the field. One may update quickly but struggle to hold weak tracks. Another may integrate longer but react more slowly. One may separate nearby objects cleanly. Another may blend them together. The waveform is one of the design choices behind those differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
