<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Automation on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/automation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Automation on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:49:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/automation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Automated vs Human-in-the-Loop Surveillance Systems</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/automated-vs-human-in-the-loop-surveillance-systems/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:49:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/automated-vs-human-in-the-loop-surveillance-systems/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Surveillance teams often talk about automation as if the only question is how much human effort can be removed. That is usually the wrong framing. The more important question is which decisions the system can make safely on its own and which decisions still need human judgment, accountability, or contextual interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is the difference between automated surveillance and human-in-the-loop surveillance.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-a-fully-automated-layer-does-well&#34;&gt;What a Fully Automated Layer Does Well&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Automation is useful when the job is repetitive, time-sensitive, and structurally well defined. In surveillance, that often means:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
