<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Facility Protection on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/facility-protection/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Facility Protection on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 21:10:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/facility-protection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Oil &amp; Gas Facility Security</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/oil-gas-facility-security/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/oil-gas-facility-security/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oil and gas facility security is shaped by an uncomfortable combination of factors: large or fragmented site footprints, hazardous processes, constrained access routes, and assets whose disruption can have consequences beyond the fence line. A good design therefore has to do more than detect intrusion. It has to support safe verification, operational continuity, and coordination between security staff and operations teams.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is one reason energy security frameworks emphasize resilience as well as protection. The U.S. Department of Energy describes the sector as geographically dispersed and interdependent, which means a facility security architecture should be judged not only by whether it detects an event, but also by how well it helps the site preserve safe operations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
