<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Harbor Monitoring on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/harbor-monitoring/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Harbor Monitoring on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 21:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/harbor-monitoring/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Port &amp; Harbor Surveillance</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/port-harbor-surveillance/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/port-harbor-surveillance/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Port and harbor surveillance is more complex than a shoreline camera network. Ports combine berth operations, navigation channels, landside freight movement, waterside exclusion zones, and a mix of public and private stakeholders. A useful surveillance architecture therefore has to support both maritime operations and security awareness across a large, mixed-use environment.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;MARAD and USCG materials both point to that complexity. Ports are intermodal gateways, not isolated waterfront sites, which means waterside sensing should be connected to how vessels move, how cargo flows, and how security incidents are escalated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
