<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Persistent Surveillance on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/persistent-surveillance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Persistent Surveillance on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/persistent-surveillance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Border Surveillance Systems</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/border-surveillance-systems/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/border-surveillance-systems/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Border surveillance systems are designed to answer a difficult operational question: how do you maintain useful awareness across long, uneven, and often remote corridors without staffing every kilometer continuously? That question cannot be solved by one sensor family alone. It requires a layered architecture that balances persistence, mobility, false-alarm control, and operator triage.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Official U.S. border programs illustrate this emphasis on persistence and sensor layering. U.S. Customs and Border Protection describes the use of surveillance towers, cameras, radar, and AI-assisted observation in remote areas, while strategic planning documents continue to frame technology as a force multiplier rather than a stand-alone substitute for operations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
