<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Radar Design on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/radar-design/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Radar Design on Counter UAV Radar — Low-Altitude Surveillance Radar</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:08:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/tags/radar-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>FMCW vs Pulse Radar: Advantages and Limitations Explained</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/fmcw-vs-pulse-radar-advantages-and-limitations-explained/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:08:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/knowledge-base/fmcw-vs-pulse-radar-advantages-and-limitations-explained/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;FMCW and pulse radar are often introduced as two different ways to build radar. That is correct, but it is not enough for system planning. The important question is how the transmit method changes the rest of the sensing chain, from hardware complexity and power profile to range behavior and mission fit.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The better comparison is therefore not only how they work, but what each architecture makes easier or harder.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
