<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>镜头选型 on 反无人机雷达 — 低空监视雷达系统</title>
    <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/zh/tags/%E9%95%9C%E5%A4%B4%E9%80%89%E5%9E%8B/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 镜头选型 on 反无人机雷达 — 低空监视雷达系统</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>zh-CN</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.counteruavradar.com/zh/tags/%E9%95%9C%E5%A4%B4%E9%80%89%E5%9E%8B/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>DRI 标准如何影响 EO/IR 系统选型</title>
      <link>https://www.counteruavradar.com/zh/knowledge-base/how-dri-criteria-change-eo-ir-system-selection/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.counteruavradar.com/zh/knowledge-base/how-dri-criteria-change-eo-ir-system-selection/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When a buyer asks, &amp;ldquo;How far can this EO/IR system see?&amp;rdquo;, the answer is usually too vague to be useful. The real question is more specific: how far can it detect, how far can it recognize, and how far can it identify?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is what DRI criteria change. They turn one loose range claim into three distinct visual tasks. Once that happens, field of view, focal length, stabilization, target size assumptions, and even the role of the sensor inside the wider system all need to be re-examined.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
